Making of Humanities: Biological Roots of Mathematics and Cooperation
A joint workshop of Social Psychology and Neuroethology

Date & Time:

  • July 28 (Mon), 2014
  • 9:30am - 11:30am (Session 1)
  • 1:00pm - 3:00pm (Session 2)

Venue:

  • Alumni Hall “Frate”,
  • School of Medicine, Hokkaido University (Sapporo)
MAP

Organizers:

*Toshiya Matsushima

Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University

Tatsuya Kameda

Center for Experimental Research in Social Sciences, Hokkaido University

Masaki Tanaka

Systems Neuroscience Laboratory, School of Medicine, Hokkaido University

Randolf Menzel

Neurobiology, Free University of Berlin, Germany

Contact us at * matusima(at)sci.hokudai.ac.jp for inquiries. (Replace (at) with @)

Download Poster (pdf)

Links:

2014ICN/JSCPB JSSP2014

Perspectives:

This workshop aims at integrative bio-psychological approaches toward understanding of human beings in terms of their “sunny sides” of intelligence. Particular attentions will be paid to two domains: Mathematics and large-scale Cooperation. To address these topics, we will adopt traditional strategy of ethology, that is the “Tinbergenfs four questions.” Through understanding of evolution, development, function and mechanism, we would expect to gain comprehensive views.

People often say that mathematics is the Queen of sciences. Actually, numerical accountings could underlie our reasoning in many aspects. However, biology / psychology could predate instead, and mathematical thinking could originate from ancestral mental representation of magnitudes. Questions are therefore, how our sense of number is shared among animals of diverse phylogeny and how it is formed.

In the morning session 1, Giorgio Vallortigara (Univ Trento, Italy) will tell us how newly hatched domestic chicks count number and do arithmetic, stressing the core knowledge systems shared by animals and humans. Elisabeth Brannon (Duke Univ, USA) will tell us how 6 months old human infants sense numbers, suggesting the non-verbal origins of number representations. Tetsuro Matsuzawa (Kyoto Univ, Japan) will tell us how chimpanzees form working memory of numerical order, and discuss why they often predominate humans. Shinsuke Shimojo (Cal Tech, USA) is expected to give comments on these topical talks, addressing the underlying perceptive mechanisms of modality-independent sense of time and frequency.

Similarly, the order of human social life is characterized by large-scale cooperation which is often reflected in our sense of justice, or empathetic concern that accommodates morality. The cooperation has dynamics that is often shared among diverse cultures, thus could also have bio-psychological basis. Such collective behaviors could emerge through interactions of individuals which have only short-sighted egocentric behavioral rules.

In the afternoon session 2, Shinya Yamamoto (Kobe Univ, Japan) will tell us how helping behavior and its cognition evolved based on empirical studies with chimpanzees and bonobos. Naoki Masuda (Univ Bristol, UK) will tell us how large-scale cooperation among non-kin members may be evolutionarily stable using a game-theoretic model. Tatsuya Kameda (Hokkaido Univ, Japan) will tell us how empathic concern may shape our sense of justice in distribution of resources among non-kin. Commentaries by Michael Platt (Duke Univ, USA) on these three topics are expected to address the link between the neural mechanisms and the evolution of large-scale cooperation.

Acknowledgement: This workshop is supported by the Japanese Society of Social Psychology (Prof T. Kameda, organizing committee of the 55th annual meeting), Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (MEXT Japan) for “Elucidation of the Neural Computation for Prediction and Decision Making” (Prof K. Doya @ OIST), for “Evolutionary Origin and Neural Basis of the Empathic Systems” (Prof T. Hasegawa @ University of Tokyo), “The Science of Mental Time” (Prof S. Kitazawa @ Osaka University). Supports from the Hokkaido University are also to be acknowledged.

09:30- Session 1 “Mathematics”

The Kantian chick: core knowledge of object, space and number

Giorgio Vallortigara
Centre for Mind-Brain Sciences, University of Trento

The human mind appears to be built on a set of core knowledge systems that represent significant aspects of the environment such as physical objects, spatial relationships, and number. I shall discuss evidence showing precocious abilities in newborn chicks to represent (a) inert objects with their basic mechanical properties, (b) the cardinal and ordinal aspects of numerical cognition, and (c) the geometrical relationships among extended surfaces in the surrounding layout. Controlled rearing studies suggest that the abilities associated with core knowledge systems of objects, number, and geometry are observed in these animals in the absence (or with very reduced) experience.

The development and evolution of mathematical cognition

Elizabeth Brannon
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University

Adult humans quantify, label, and categorize almost every aspect of the world with numbers. The ability to use numbers is one of the most complex cognitive abilities that humans possess and is often held up as a defining feature of the human mind. In my talk I will present a body of data that demonstrates that there are strong developmental and evolutionary precursors to adult mathematical cognition that can be uncovered by studying human infants and nonhuman primates. Developmental data and controversies will be discussed in light of comparative research with monkeys and other animals allowing us to see both parallels and discontinuities in the evolutionary and developmental building blocks of adult human cognition. Implications for education will be highlighted by describing a) a longitudinal study exploring the relationship between nonverbal numerical sense in infancy and later developing mathematical cognition in childhood and b) a set of studies exploring the malleability of approximate number representations in adulthood and the relationship between nonverbal numerical acuity and symbolic mathematics.

Symbolic representation of number and working memory in chimpanzees

Tetsuro Matsuzawa
Institute of Primatology, Kyoto University

Chimpanzees can represent, to some extent, both the cardinal and the ordinal aspect of number. Through the medium of Arabic numerals I have compared working memory in humans and chimpanzees using the same apparatus. Young chimpanzees outperformed human adults in memorizing briefly presented numerals. However, we found that chimpanzees were less proficient at a variety of other cognitive tasks including symmetry of symbols and referents, cross-modal matching, imitation, etc. In sum, chimpanzees do not possess human-like capabilities for representation. The present talk will discuss the constraints of the number concept in chimpanzees, and illuminate some unique features of human cognition.

commentary

Shinsuke Shimojo
Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology

13:00- Session 2 “Cooperation”

Prosociality in chimpanzees and bonobos: its cognitive mechanisms and evolution

Shinya Yamamoto
Faculty of Intercultural Studies, Kobe University

One of the hottest questions within the social and biological sciences revolves around the evolution of cooperation. However, we still know little of its proximate cognitive mechanisms. Here I introduce our recent studies on chimpanzeesf and bonobosf prosocial behaviour both in the wild and in the laboratory. The experimental evidences suggest the importance of direct communicative interaction in the occurrence of chimpanzeesf helping. Chimpanzees understand what a partner needs; however, they rarely help others proactively without the partnerfs request. Starting with this ghelping upon requesth, Ifll discuss the evolution of cooperation from the viewpoint of comparative cognitive science with our closest living relatives.

Neural underpinning of cooperation under indirect reciprocity

Naoki Masuda
Department of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol

Humans often cooperate with strangers in social dilemma situations even when future encounters with the same peers are not expected. The indirect reciprocity, one such mechanism, has two subtypes: reputation-based and pay-it-forward. Past game-theoretical research showed that pay-it-forward but not reputation-based reciprocity, in which humans help others after being helped by someone else, is not justified as stable behavior. We provide functional and anatomical neural evidence underlying the two types of indirect reciprocity. Cooperation as reputation-based and pay-it-forward reciprocity particularly recruited the precuneus and anterior insula (AI), respectively. Different from reputation-based reciprocity, pay-it-forward reciprocity may not occur as myopic profit-maximization but elicit emotional rewards.

The Maximin rule as a key cognitive anchor in distributive justice and risky decisions: Rawls in our minds

Tatsuya Kameda
Center for Experimental Research in Social Sciences, Hokkaido University

Distributive justice concerns how societies should distribute resources. Although vigorously debated across many social-science disciplines, the relationships between normative theories of distributive justice and actual behavior remain unclear. Using attention-monitoring and brain-imaging techniques, we examined cognitive bases of John Rawlsfs moral argument that distributive justice is fundamentally related to risky decisions via a focus on the worst-off position. We found that across participants with various ideologies, the greatest attention was paid to how bad choice-outcomes could be; notably, activations of the right temporo-parietal junction reflected the degree of that concern for distribution and risky-decision tasks. These two fundamental, seemingly disparate decisions may be intertwined in the human mind, drawing on common cognitive processes with a spontaneous focus on the maximin criterion.

commentary

Michael Platt
Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University

人間性の構築:数学と協同の生物学的基盤
社会心理学と神経行動学のジョイント・ワークショップ

【日時】

  • 2014年7月28日(月)
  • 午前の部:9:30am – 11:30am
  • 午後の部:1:00pm – 3:00pm

【会場】

  • 北海道大学 医学部学友会館「フラテ」ホール
MAP

【オーガナイザー】

*松島俊也

北海道大学・理学部・生物科学科(生物学)

亀田達也

北海道大学・文学部・社会科学実験研究センター

田中真樹

北海道大学・医学部・神経生理学教室

Randolf Menzel

ドイツ・ベルリン自由大学・神経生物学教室

お問い合わせ先 * matusima(at)sci.hokudai.ac.jp for inquiries. ( (at)を@に置き換えてください。)

Download Poster (pdf)

【関連リンク】

ニューロエソロジー国際会議(2014ICN/JSCPB) 日本社会心理学会第55回大会(JSSP2014)

講演の概要:

この国際研究集会は、日本社会心理学会とニューロエソロジー国際会議のジョイント・ワークショップとして企画されました。人間性、つまり「人間を人間たらしめる」様々なものの中から、数の理解と協同行動に注目します。これらは人間の知性や論理、正義や倫理の根幹を成すものとして、従来哲学の対象であると考えられてきました。しかし近年の行動学・心理学・脳科学の急速な発展の結果、これらは必ずしも人間に固有のものではないことが分かって参りました。多くの動物が数や順序を理解し、規範的な協同行動を示します。私たち人間も言葉を覚えるよりも早く数を理解します。もちろん、動物や幼児の振る舞いは人間(成人)と同じではありませんが、進化や発達の過程を見極めることによって「人間とは何か」を明らかにすることができる、と私たちは考えています。

午前の部では数学(数の理解)を扱います。イタリア・トレント大学のGiorgio Vallortigara教授はヒヨコの行動の研究を通して、彼らが数の大小や順序を理解し、更に増減を計算している証拠を得ました。アメリカ・デューク大学のElisabeth Brannon 教授は人間の赤ん坊やヒト以外の霊長類の研究から、言語の獲得よりも、数や量の理解の方が先行していることを明らかにしました。京都大学霊長研のTetsuro Matsuzawa教授はチンパンジーに人間の数字(アラビヤ数字)を教え、彼らが人間より優れた作業記憶を示すこと、しかし人間の認知には彼らにはない独自の個性があると語ります。これらのお話をめぐって、アメリカ・カリフォルニア工科大学のShinsuke Shimojo教授にコメントを頂き、議論をいたします。

午後の部では協同(大規模な協力行動)を扱います。神戸大学のShinya Yamamoto准教授は我々人間の最も近い親戚チンパンジーとボノボの行動に基づいて、人間の協同行動がどのような段階を経て進化したのか、議論します。イギリス・ブリストル大学のNaoki Masuda准教授は人間の間接的互恵行動に注目します。自己の評判に基づいて行動する時と、得た利益を第三者へ送り回す時(ペイ・フォワード行動)の脳活動を解析して、これら二つを切り分けることに成功しました。北大文学部のTatsuya Kameda教授は人間の正義にまつわる行動を、脳科学と生態学の視点から理解しようとします。資源分配とリスクの下での決定と言う二つの局面が、単純なMaxmin原理(最悪の事態の軽減を図る行動原理)によって実現していること、共通の認知・神経メカニズムが関与していることを示します。これらのお話をめぐって、アメリカ・デューク大学のMichael Platt教授にコメントを頂き、議論をいたします。

この研究集会は英語で行ないます。通訳等は準備しません。参加費はなく、また事前の参加登録も必要としません。

IBRO(国際脳研究機構)による神経行動学のサマースクールの一環として実施すると共に、北海道大学大学院・発達脳科学専攻の科目「脳科学研究の展開4a」の指定セミナーとして位置づけております。さらに、この分野に関心をお持ちの北大関係者(教職員・学生)、日本社会心理学会第55回大会の参加者など、学内外の多くの方の参加をお待ちしています。

謝辞:北海道大学からの助成と共に、文部科学省の3つの新学術領域の協賛を得て実施いたします。ここに記して、深く感謝申し上げます。
「予測と意思決定の脳内計算機構の解明による人間理解と応用」(代表、沖縄科学技術大学院大学・教授・銅谷賢治)
「こころの時間学-現在・過去・未来の期限を求めて-」(代表、大阪大学・教授・北澤茂)
「共感性の進化・神経基盤」(代表、東京大学・教授・長谷川寿一)